Freemasonic Journalism and Western Mass Media Misinformation About "Iraq"
Dr. Muhammad Shamsaddin Megalommatis
November 18, 2008
Writing on the day on which the fake government of the Baghdad puppets announced its approval of the suggested military pact, according to which the last US soldiers will leave Iraq in 2011, Daniel Williams offered to his readership nothing else except deliberate confusion, utmost disorientation, and immoral approaches and considerations. At the end of the present article, I republish his article that bears the fanciful title: `Sons of Iraq' Fight Terrorism, Beg Obama to Keep Troops There. I will however comment first.
The article is an effort to leave the reader with the fallacious impression that most of the Iraqis reject all those involved in terrorist acts and that for this very reason they support the prolongation of the US soldiers´ presence there.
This is wrong, but this reality is of absolutely secondary importance.
It is not by coincidence that Daniel Williams terminates his title by the word ´there´; his ´there´ is not the presently occupied state of Iraq but an imaginative fabrication which can effectively be located in any continent, except perhaps Antarctica.
Apostate Freemasonic Order´s Fallacious Style of Journalism Geared to Replace Truth
Journalism means diffusion of true and genuine information. Iraq is not an unknown country; all the data are available in hundreds of websites. Reflecting the true situation and reality that prevails "there" should be Daniel Williams´ job.
But instead of referring to or mentioning real data objectively, Daniel Williams is paid to misinform Western readerships. He then enters his fallacious story about someone called Omar Jaffar!
If someone wants to learn what happens in Iraq, he has to spare names of individuals and personal stories. These stories reveal nothing but the subjective and therefore totally unrepresentative viewpoint of the quoted individual.
The reality of the data is then replaced by the fallacy of the selected individual´s narratives. This does not happen by coincidence; it is part of the pre-ordered, machinated journalism which has been promoted over the past 60 80 years by the Apostate Freemasonic Lodge and their disciples and apprentice journalists.
Journalism existed indeed before they came up with their effort to plunge the entire world into an ocean of lies. But no one can find the style of this fallacious and immoral journalism in 19th century´s newspapers, reviews and magazines. By then, the truth was reported in a far more genuine way: naked.
Only after WW II , we started being inundated by fake "persons", real personoids that "confess" their "thoughts", and in the process alter the reality and confuse vast readerships. The point is not whether the quoted individual exists or not or whether he is correctly quoted or not. The problem is that this is done while in parallel absolute darkness covers the real data which are not presented to the readership. The problem is indeed worse; the fact that the quoted individual is not a representative voice of average Iraqi expression and that his ideas may not represent those of even 10% of the entire population of the country leads to total misrepresentation of the situation.
The real data are hidden, and a false and unrepresentative voice is given status of an ambassador.
In fact, the situation is far worse; the real conviction, the ideas and the beliefs of the outright majority of the peoples of Mesopotamia (Iraq) are covered by a veil of silence. This completes the entire misinformation campaign.
The Real Data about Iraq Kept Hidden by Daniel Williams
Who is this unrepresentative Omar Jaffar who happens to be quoted by Daniel Williams? The author describes him as a Sunni Muslim and Baghdad resident. Very well! This means he is an Arabic speaking Sunni Iraqi.
What is the percentage of this ethno-religious group in Iraq?
Approximately 10%!
This means automatically that the author tries to portray the minority group of Sunni Arabic speaking Iraqis as the main possible representative!
Why this predilection?
Before explaining the point, it is necessary to underscore that Daniel Williams did not mention in his fallacious article anything about
the persecuted Aramaeans of Iraq (inaccurately called Assyrians and Chaldaeans),
the massacred Turkmen,
the excruciated Yazidis,
the tyrannized Failis, and
the marginalized Mandaeans, Ahl-Haq, Shabaks, and Armenians, let alone the Arabic speaking Shia of Iraq.
The colonial entity "Iraq", as created as a fake state by the English colonials in order to be part of the great Anti-Turkish, Anti-Ottoman, and Anti-Islamic project that was unfolded in the Middle East and Northeastern Africa, was geared to be part of the fake ´Arab´ nation.
This fabricated and non existent nation, materialized through the reduction of the Berbers, the Copts, the Kushitic Sudanese, the Yemenites and the Aramaeans to "Arabs" (who in reality are only the Arabic speaking population of Hedjaz in today´s Saudi Arabia), became the instrument of the English French colonial policies against Turkey, Iran, Shia Islam, non-Arabic Islam, and Secular Islam.
Arabic speaking populations´ pathetic ignorance, lack of national integrity, and deprivation of elementary cultural background and historical identity prevent them from any nation building process, and for this reason, they are preferred by the colonial regimes, academia, diplomats, and leaders who find in the Sunni Arabic speaking populations and elites the world´s most idiotic, most servile and most materialistic society. This society´s leaders can be manipulated at ease.
Repugnant Immorality of the liars
There is another far more problematic point with the aforementioned, bias approach.
Iraq´s Arabic -speaking Sunnis, like the unrepresentative Omar Jaffar of Daniel Williams´s fallacious journalism, because of the continuous promotion they had enjoyed ever since the English forces put Ottoman territories under control, rose to power early and without truly having the right, they controlled the country.
Due to the fact that their population never exceeded ca. 10% of the country´s entire population, the Arabic speaking Sunni of Iraq had to either respect the rest and pursue a democratic approach or impose a socio-economic political tyranny. This tyranny ended up with a quarter century spent under the notorious Saddam Hussein.
This has been the US and allied forces´ primary misconception and misdeed in Iraq: they did not realize that their intervention would be morally justified only if they gave Justice to the persecuted, oppressed, tyrannized, and massacred nations and ethno-religious groups of Iraq.
Justice in 2003 would mean punishment of the Arabic speaking Sunnis, involving much more than mere dismantlement of the administrative machine and the army hierarchy. They should have already been stripped of their properties that had all been made to the prejudice of all the rest and with the demised dictator´s approval, and they should have been forced to move to a specially prepared region of camps where they should been reeducated before being allowed to conduct a free life all in different places than their earlier, undeserved, homes.
Camps for the righteous and the oppressed is not a solution; true justice means homes for the righteous and camps for the cruel and the unjust.
Justice in 2008 means nothing less than implementation of what did not happen to be considered on 2003. Turkmen, Christian Aramaeans and Yazidis who migrated because of tyranny must return and the country must be divided into many parts, not just three (3). The division must definitely incorporate the principles of Justice and Equity, and the decimated Aramaeans of Mesopotamia, who left the Ottoman provinces first and have been scattered to the rest of the world, must be the first to be offered a triumphal return.
Achieving security for a New Mesopotamia, divided into many small, con-federal entities, is not the work of America but of Turkey. It is the diffusion of the secular concept of Kemal Ataturk that can help eliminate the Iranian menace over Iraq. At the same time, it will help every segregated and pacified nation and ethno-religious group see the others with due respect and reciprocal solidarity; otherwise America will fail and various gangsters and paranoids will turn the American failure in Iraq into a nightmarish defeat.
Here, I republish integrally the misrepresentative narrative of Daniel Williams; you can admire Omar Jaffar´s, and Saddam Hussein Mafia´s, defiance and cynicism. And Daniel Williams´s ability to portray these rascals as the "Voice of Iraq". This "voice" threatens us all as a matter of fact.
Sons of Iraq' Fight Terrorism, Beg Obama to Keep Troops There
By Daniel Williams
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aytn4zTM0_n8&refer=home
Nov. 17 (Bloomberg) -- Omar Jaffar spends his days helping keep the streets of his Baghdad neighborhood safe for his fellow Sunni Muslims. He has an urgent message for President-Elect Barack Obama:
Don't take American soldiers away just yet,'' Jaffar said in his home in the capital's Adhamiyah section. They are needed for ``maybe five years. Who knows? We need them.''
Jaffar, 19, belongs to the Sons of Iraq, a paramilitary group of about 100,000 once-hostile Sunni Muslims that the U.S. pays to help pacify Baghdad and other regions. Though allied with the American military, the Shiite-dominated government of Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki views the group with suspicion, expressing fears that it may become a belligerent militia.
That leaves the Sons of Iraq suspended between competing agendas: an American one aimed at minimizing violence and an Iraqi government goal to marginalize potential internal enemies, said Terrence K. Kelly, a senior operations researcher for the Rand Corp. in Pittsburgh.
They would be exposed'' if U.S. forces left, he said. ``Iraqi security forces could come get them. That's their big worry.''
Jaffar and about 1,800 fellow Sons of Iraq members in Adhamiyah help the U.S. hunt terrorists. The neighborhood once harbored members of Osama Bin Laden's al-Qaeda network. Before the Sunnis began joining forces with the U.S., it also was a bastion for Sunni Muslim insurgents who bedeviled American forces with ambushes and roadside bombs.
Sectarian Rivals
The Sons of Iraq cling to U.S. forces in part because they view the Iraqi government as antagonistic. Shiite Muslims, sectarian rivals of Iraq's Sunni minority, dominate the al- Maliki government and Sunnis were a mainstay of deposed leader Saddam Hussein. His 25 years in power featured roundups and executions of Shiites, many buried in mass graves discovered since 2003.
We don't know if the government wants to live with us or not,'' said Jaffar, who called it a tool of Shiite-ruled Iran.
American troops are the organizers, paymasters and military muscle behind the Sons of Iraq. In Adhamiyah, members don't think they can get along without them.
Maybe they could just go and stay inside bases and come out when we need them,'' suggested Mahmoud Musaib, who once belonged to Hussein's Special Republican Guard, the Republican Guard unit that was late dictator's personal security force.
2011 Target
The Sons' fate may become enmeshed in discussions over how and when U.S. forces will be drawn down in Iraq. The Iraqi government yesterday approved an accord with the administration of President George W. Bush that would let U.S. forces stay until the end of 2011. It is subject to parliamentary consent.
During his campaign, Obama pledged to withdraw combat forces earlier, within 16 months of his January 2009 inauguration, and bolster U.S. forces in Afghanistan. Obama has said he would keep some troops in Iraq to train the country's military and police, conduct counter-terrorism missions and protect U.S. civilian personnel.
Either deadline would test whether the Iraqis can hold al- Qaeda at bay and suppress anti-government Iraqi Sunnis.
The Iraqis may not be quite ready to take care of their own security,'' said Lt. Frank Simmons, whose B Company from the 3d Brigade, Fourth Infantry Division, patrols Adhamiyah and keeps tabs on the Sons of Iraq in a so-called ``overwatch'' role. ``The place is still dangerous.''
Raiding Hideouts
The patrols also raid hideouts to round up enemy suspects fingered by the Sons of Iraq and neighborhood informers.
On Nov. 10, attackers detonated a bomb in an Adhamiyah market, and then a suicide bomber followed up by detonating another explosive. Twenty-eight people died. The perpetrators haven't been identified.
Jaffar said his father was in Hussein's army, making him a target of Shiite wrath. ``Saddam kept the country in control,'' he said. ``We didn't have this killing of each other.''
Anti-Sunni rampages by Shiite death squads in 2005 and 2006 especially targeted Sunnis who belonged to Hussein's extensive security apparatus.
Al-Qaeda, in the meantime, began killing anyone suspected of cooperating with the U.S. Since the Sunni-U.S. alliance started in western Iraq about two years ago, violent incidents have plummeted.
Gas Station
Jaffar said al-Qaeda operatives killed two of his brothers because he wanted to help the Americans defend Sunnis against Shiite marauders. A comrade, Omar Jamal Ibrahim, said a Shiite terrorist bombing of a gas station killed his father. Al-Qaeda assassins killed a third companion of Musaib, 24, he said, because he started cooperating with the Army.
In 2005 and 2006, bodies often littered the shore of a stretch of the Tigris River that separates Adhamiyah from the large Shiite Qadamiyah neighborhood to the west, said Qusay Ahmed, who joined the Sons of Iraq in 2007. Many had been dumped there by Shiite marauders, he added.
These days, Ahmed never leaves Adhamiyah, saying he's afraid someone will finger him for having worked in Hussein's security services.
I wouldn't even cross the river for a glass of water,'' said Ahmed, 34. ``It's not time for the Americans to think about leaving.''
Jaffar and his comrades, unemployed before joining the Sons of Iraq, are waiting for the al-Maliki government to show it wants to work with them. The U.S. has been paying Sons of Iraq members $300 a month each to stand at checkpoints, search cars and inform on possible troublemakers. Jaffar was unarmed; some Sons of Iraq carry pistols and occasionally rifles.
Iraq's government was supposed to take over payment of the salaries last month, but the group in Adhamiyah has yet to receive a check. Government spokesman Ali Al-Dabbagh said in a statement that the government is ``committed to integrate the members into public life.''
In some ways, the Sons of Iraq view their group as a kind of jobs program that may lead to work in the Iraqi army.
We're Iraqi. Why not? We fight al-Qaeda and Iran,'' Jaffar said.
To contact the reporter on this story: Daniel Williams in Baghdad at dwilliams41@bloomberg.net.
Print
Share
Email
